Finding the Art in Everything


06 March, 2008

Resolution Brings Closure but Not the Other Way Around

A couple of years ago, one of my closest friends from college and I awoke to find a line drawn in the sand and ourselves on opposite sides of it. We spent about 6 months staring at the line, and in long, fruitless conversations, tried to figure out how it got there. We stayed there, toe to toe, on the line, until a few months and a final visit before his wedding.

On his last visit, I noticed we weren’t toe-to-toe anymore, and I may have been the only one to see it at first. Pretty soon, the conversation changed from curiosity regarding the line’s origination to pointing out who stepped away first. Other people even weighed in on the situation, free to cross back and forth across the line that paralyzed us.

Then it got worse. Both convinced the other one had moved, we backed further away, until we were shouting to be heard—which made us back even further away, because, ironically, it felt like someone was talking too loudly too closely. And then I felt hoarse and stopped responding. And pretty soon I didn’t hear any more shouting from beyond the line. People even stopped carrying messages across it.

And the silence turned into something much bigger than a simple ceasefire. Because in a ceasefire, the opponents are still fixed on each other, facing one another with a kind of readiness. We had turned from the line to build our own civilization on our side. We didn’t feel the threat anymore—we just didn’t feel anything. Only one person still traveled back and forth, with the occasional update from the other side of the line.

But we had shared a lot and he still had a great deal of stuff on my side. He left some priceless 3am conversation. He left music: All Weather Human, U2, Jimmy Eat World, David Gray, and Brit rock in general. He left Guinness, Tennet’s bitter, Fuller’s London Pride, curry and cous cous. He left his guitar capo and sarcasm, along with French-pressed, French roast coffee. He left all the Wes Anderson and Guy Ritchie Films. He left a nickname, an art history book, Bruce Campbell, a half a dozen bottles of red wine, Caravaggio, and twenty days of European travel.. I kept using these things every day, never really boxing them up to give back.

“I couldn’t have given them back, anyway,” I told myself. “There were too many and we were always going to be on separate sides,” I assured. A few weeks ago, I realized how much of what he left I couldn’t live without. There was no denying where they came from or how many there were. So I sent him a message telling him I had them, and I’d always be grateful he left them, and that I wouldn’t forget where they came from.

I didn’t see, then, that the line had become a wall, or foresee my message would be scrambled and incoherent from the other side. The message brought us closer to the wall than we’d been to the line for years (could there a chance…?), but it was still higher than we could reach. Another round of messages prompted a second look at the wall and staring up, we could not longer see where it stopped. I offered to build a bridge of common interests over the wall, so we can find a way to share the things he left.

“No,” he says, “The wall is too high.” The only way to share is for you to squeeze through this hairline crack in the brickwork.”

“A person cannot fit through that crack; a spider could not even fit!” I argued. “If I can’t use the bridge, the stuff isn’t worth sharing.”

“The bridge is not tall enough,” he messaged back. “I am sorry we are stuck forever.”

And yesterday, on this, we finally found ourselves on the same side.

And it’s a horrible feeling.

04 March, 2008

Limerick Intervention

Instead of updating one's blog,
One decided to go for a jog.
Yet still the group'll wait,
Though making ransom notes til late,
And getting more response from the dog.

01 March, 2008

History in Art Nouveau


We just finished the Gilded Age in my AP class, my trip with students to the Morse Museum in Winter Park was particularly meaningful. In class, we talked about the American triumphalism as displayed at the Chicago World's Fair, and the museum has that Louis Comfort Tiffany chapel reconstructed from its first display there. Tiffany is such a great example for this period because, as one historian explains, he "combines decorative genius with scientific experimentation and commercial acumen."

Another reason I call attention to Tiffany is that I really enjoy the rare moments when America gets to participate in the grand tradition of Western art. Even rarer still are times when America's artistic contribution surpasses any European one. And thanks to Sargent, Whistler (my favorite) and Homer, we get that at the turn of the century.

I have been having a discussion regarding classroom content and patriotism with an erudite stranger. I had asked him whether patriotism and personal ideology had any place in the classroom. He replied that teaching patriotism was "better left to Joseph Goebbels and Hugo Chavez." Blind patriotism is no friend of truth and accuracy. But patriotism is only one kind of these ideas with the power to poison. Plenty of 19th century art was wrecked with an over paint of Victorian morality.

In reading about Tiffany, I came across a description of his contemporary, Homer, which really resonated with me. He "was not interested in painting morals, merely recording nature truthfully, though his viewpoint was always personal and could be tendentious." Homer himself said, "When I have selected a thing carefully, I painted it exactly as it appears.*" Here, Homer's naturalistic integrity speaks to more than the painter; it also serves the historian and the history teacher. We need to put aside our bias, employing careful selection and an exacting approach to verisimilitude. And while the product may be marked by a strong, implicit point of view, it is more likely free from the dangerous artificiality begotten by ideological imposition.

I recall my drawing instructor in college requiring us to practice a technique called "contour drawing." We had to draw the outline of our subject without looking at the paper or really picking up our pencil. It was partly to train our hand-eye coordination, but most important, it was to force us to closely examine our subject for what it was and divorce us from our pre-conceived notions of how it is supposed to look. In doing this, it surprised me with how often my suppositions were wrong, which in turn, wrecks the whole artistic attempt. A line can betray a commitment to the supposition instead of the thing itself.

For history to be worth anything, one has to be like Homer and hold versimilitude as the highest ideal. If we don't, any other emergent ideal is rendered defective because of its faulty basis.



*Paul Johnson, Art: A New History


17 February, 2008

PostSecret

Secret:
People who quote Ghandi REALLY get on my nerves.



Profile

Tonight, as a family, we sat down and took the personality class my dad administers to his management classes. Here are some of my results regarding my work performance and relationships:


People like me
usually are.......................................................which can be seen as
Flexible ………………………………………………….Wishy-washy
Optimistic …………………………………………………..Unrealistic
Enthusiastic ………………………………………………..Egotistical
Confident, poised …………………………………….Self-promoting
Tactful …………………………………………………………Evasive
Socially adept ……………………………………………….Insincere
Persuasive ………………………………………………Manipulative
Fun-loving …………………………………………………….Childish
Spontaneous …………………………………………..Undisciplined
Tolerant …………………………………………..Non-discriminative
Open …………………………………………………………Talkative
Trusting ………………………………………………………..Gullible


Overview of Traits:
Characteristic: Persuasive, confident

Traits: Impulsive, flexible, charming, poised, warm, friendly, talkative, enthusiastic, optimistic, emotional, sympathetic, generous

Motivators: Inspired purpose, creative solution

Values:Pleasure, fun, freedom of speech, openness, honesty, active experimentation, creativity, inspiration, insight

Typically Overuses: Optimism, enthusiasm, overselling self/ideas, tact, indirect approaches, praise, encouragement, tolerance, flexibility, impulsiveness

Value to the Team: Poised, confident, delegates responsibility, promotes people and projects, generates ideas and enthusiasm, sees the big picture, sees innovative solutions, relieves tension



Points to Remember when Dealing with People Like Me:

Goals
*To get things done in a creative way
*To keep people happy/satisfied
*To create democratic working relationships
*To maintain freedom from control/details

Likes
*Working with others, yet maintaining flexibility
*Approval and recognition

Dislikes
*Being bogged down in detail and follow through
*Working in a fixed environment
*Taking advantage of others
*Having to “hard sell”

Problem Solving
*Focuses on the “big picture”; applies imagination, creativity, insight

Decision Making
*Makes decisions quickly and can just as quickly change their minds

Time Orientation
*Thinks about tomorrow’s possibilities

Respects People Who…
*Maintain open minds
*Collaborate with them

Greatest Fear
*Loss of social approval

08 February, 2008

Driving Thoughts III

  • On my way home, I was listening to Manchester Orchestra. I marveled at the originality of composition. These are new melodies and new sets of words that come from a perfectly ordinary person. (I know, because I met him and many like him.) For someone who loves art as much as I do, I often take for granted the miracle of artistic creation. What an extraordinary thing to make something beautiful and sophisticated from nearly nothing!

  • I really hate when I make punctuation mistakes on my blog.

  • I hate Florida. It is an ugly, cultural wasteland--or so I whine--but I love my job. In an irritating moment of truth, a friend pointed out to me that I don't get Montverde Academy without Florida. Furthermore, I suspect I wouldn't appreciate my job so much if I didn't hate Florida as much as I do. If I hadn't come from a horrible administration, would I really appreciate mine so much? If I hadn't had the anti-students, would I really be as glad for the sometimes-mediocre set I have now? If my artistic well weren't so dry, would I really enjoy all that I read and learn at school so much? It seems pretty unlikely. It's really a delightful thing to be aware of one's gratitude. Gratitude begets joy. I just don't really think I'd select for myself the progression of misery->gratitude-> joy.

06 February, 2008

Progressivism

In my AP class, we have been digging at the nature of Progressivism, a time in the early 20th century heralded for its tremendous social, political, and economic reform.

  • Was it really a movement by the people to curb powerful interests? (The actual success of the efforts indicate otherwise).
  • Or was it just an effory by a small, displaced elite to restore its authority?
  • Was it a product of status anxiety in the middle class, representing the efforts of a nationalized middle class to secure their place in society?
  • Or was it a movement where corporate leaders use the government to protect themselves from competition?
  • Was it just a quest for women to attain cultural and political prominance?
  • Or was it a broad effort by professionals and other middle-class people to bring order and efficiency to political and economic life?

We have been going over the causes and effects of the developing capitalist hold on American society from this period, and the by-product problems of the excruciating changes brought by industrialization, urbanization, and immigration. We have also been looking at the dire poverty of the tenements and the graft and corruption of what is supposed to be the most democratic economic and political systems.

We are taught how free competition is what's fairest, and that controlling the equality of outcome produces defective results. But it seems like the defective results of the current system go ignored. Where is the part of this glorious system that protects the voice of the broken, displaced, and destitute?

I am reading Isaiah again for the first time in five years. Its poetry and language has always moved me, but now, with the historical and political preoccupation that is one of my professional hazards, I am struck by how relevant it is. I am startled by the way its identification of defects in side-tracked Hebrew society so clearly reflects the ones in ours.


Isaiah 1:16-17 says,
"...Stop doing wrong,
learn to do right!
Seek justice,
encourage the oppressed.
Defend the cause of the fatherless,
plead the case of the widow.

Various social experiments have offered solutions that eliminate the competition in society as a way of preventing the creation of a group of "losers"--the poor and powerless. In Isaiah's first chapter, he identifies the qualities of societies that truly follow God and those that don't. It is important to note here that Isaiah doesn't call for the elimination of outcasts, but insists on their protection. It's not the system that is defective, it is the people.

The ambiguity and long-term ineffectiveness of Progressive reform is a function of the systemic approach to change instead of a personal one. The Progressives saw the need to take care of the oppressed, the fatherless, and the widows; there were so many, they could hardly be ignored. But I think they failed because they kept trying to change the system instead of the people. Is. 16-17 reveals that true reform is a process directed by God. "Wash and make yourselves clean." "Stop doing wrong [and] learn to do right." "Seek justice [and] encourage the oppressed." These are not synonyms, but steps.

It is not enough to just behave well personally, but good behavior must overflow into an outward acting against oppressors. The application of true justice doesn't just mediate the effects of the oppressor, but it fights to restrain him. Good works are not enough to make a real change in a broken society. Isaiah reveals that deep, lasting reform comes from an individual righteousness that overflows from a covenant with God.

On our best day, we might be able to wash away the grime of materialism and competition, but we won't be truly cleansed until we individually submit to the righteousness of God from the inside out.